Criminal Indictments Issued!!!

 

I Have Handed Over To A Court The Following Criminal Indictments.

The Court I Handed The Criminal Indictments To Was Nottingham Kangaroo Court ( Magistrates Court) Court Number 9 At 12:00. on 18,10,21

I Think The Mistake I Made Was Letting The Court Hand Over The Indictments To The Criminal Protection Service I Mean The Crown Prosecution Service I Mean Criminal Protection Service.

Let's Be Honest The Criminal Protection Service Will Not Want Any Of This Getting Out So I'm Sure They Will Want to Cover It Up And Pretend The Indictments Along With All The Evidence I Supplied With The Indictments Have Conveniently Gone Missing.

Please Note I Have Only Uploaded The Counts And Particulars Of Offence.

IN THE CROWN COURT AT LINCOLN

URN NUMBER

Form of Indictment

Criminal Procedure Rules Part 10

B E T W E E N:

REGINA

.v.

CHIEF CONSTABLE OF LINCOLNSHIRE POLICE CHRIS HAWARD

 Charged As Follows:

 

COUNT 1

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Aiding And Abetting Contrary To The Accessories And Abettors Act 1861

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

You Chief Constable Of Lincolnshire Police CHRIS HAWARD Otherwise Known As CHRISTOPHER HAWARD Have Been Informed By Myself Aaron ( Redacted ) Of Crimes Committed By TRACEY PARKER Of The City Of Lincoln Council And The Fake Magistrates For Committing Fraud, Perjury And The Fake Magistrates Are Never On Their Judicial Oath Thus Fraudulently Handing Out Liability Orders, Issuing Fines And Sending People To Prison Which Is Kidnapping And False Imprisonment. The Crimes Of The Fake Magistrates Continue To This Day.

COUNT 2

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Perverting The Course Of Justice Contrary To The Common Law

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

You CHIEF CONSTABLE OF LINCOLNSHIRE POLICE CHRIS HAWARD Otherwise Known As CHRISTOPHER HAWARD Have Refused To Arrest The Offenders TRACEY PARKER And The Fake Magistrates To Justice When Informed Of Their Crimes Thus Perverting The Course Of Justice.

COUNT 3

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Misconduct In Public Office contrary to The Common Law

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

You CHIEF CONSTABLE OF LINCOLNSHIRE POLICE CHRIS HAWARD Otherwise Known As CHRISTOPHER HAWARD Have Wilfully Misconducted Yourself In Public Office You Have Done Nothing To Arrest The Offenders That You Have Been Informed of You Have Committed Crimes While In Public Office And You Have Not Fulfilled Your Oath As Constable. I Will Prevent All Offences Against People And Property And I Will Serve The Queen In The Office of Constable With Fairness, Integerity , Diligence And Impartiality ( Police Reform Act 2002 ) As You Have Interactions With The General public And Receive A Wage Paid for By Public Funds This Makes You A Public Officer And You Have Misconducted Yourself In Public Office.

IN THE CROWN COURT AT LINCOLN

URN NUMBER

Form of Indictment

Criminal Procedure Rules Part 10

B E T W E E N:

REGINA

.v.

TRACEY PARKER, CLERK TO THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE MICHAEL

SEATH

 Charged As Follows:

 

COUNT 1

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Conspiracy To Commit Fraud Contrary To Section 5 And Section 7 Of The Fraud Act 2006

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

On 7,1,20 you TRACEY PARKER And MICHAEL SEATH Issued I Aaron ( Redacted ) A Fake Summons To The Magistrates Court The Court House 358 High Street Lincoln LN5 7QA In Order To Make A Fraudulent Financial Gain.

COUNT 2

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Perjury Contrary To Section 1A, Section 5, Section 12 And Section 7 Of The Perjury Act 1911.

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

On 7,1,20 you TRACEY PARKER Committed Perjury When You Issued I Aaron ( Redacted ) With A Fake Summons To Appear At The Fake Magistrates Court 7,1,20 And This Was Supported By MICHAEL SEATH Thus Committing Section 7 Of The Perjury Act 1911 Aiders, Abettors And Suborners .

COUNT 3

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Misconduct In Public Office contrary to The Common Law

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

On 7,1,20 You TRACEY PARKER Wilfully Issued I Aaron ( Redacted ) With A False Court Summons To Make Financial Gain Committing Fraud And Perjury As You Have Interactions With The General public And Receive A Wage Paid for By Public Funds This Makes You A Public Officer And You Have Misconducted Yourself In Public Office.

COUNT 4

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Perverting The Course Of Justice Contrary To The Common Law

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

I Wrote To You TRACEY PARKER And MICHAEL SEATH And Asked You To E-Mail Me To Arrange A Recorded Interview In Regards To The Crimes You Committed In regards To A Fake Court Summons I was Sent. And Both TRACEY PARKER And MICHAEL SEATH Did Not Contact Me In For A Recorded Interview

Thus Perverting The Course Of Justice By Obstructing My Investigation

IN THE CROWN COURT AT NOTTINGHAM

URN NUMBER

Form of Indictment

Criminal Procedure Rules Part 10

B E T W E E N:

REGINA

.v.

COUNCILLOR RICHARD METCALFE, COUNCILLOR DONALD NANNESTAD, ADRIAN BULLIMORE

 Charged As Follows:

 

COUNT 1

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Section 10 Of The Landlord And Tenant Act 1985

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

Since I Have Moved Into The Property Of ( Redacted ) Lincoln Ln* *** In 2009 The Property Has Been Unfit For Human Habitation Due To Mould And Damp I Have Made The Council Aware And Nothing Has Been Done About It.

COUNT 2

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Conspiracy To Inflict Grievous Bodily Harm Contrary To Section 20 Of The Offences Against The Persons Act 1861.

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

In 2017 and 2021 I Aaron ( Redacted ) Have Been E-mailing RICHARD METCALFE, DONALD NANNESTAD And ADRIAN BULLIMORE About Mouldy Conditions At ( Redacted ) Lincoln Ln* ***. I E-mailed Photo’s And Dangers of Toxic Black Mould To The Defendants And According To The Sentencing Council Under Harm Disease Is Defined As Factors Indicating Greater Harm.

COUNT 3

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Misconduct In Public Office contrary to The Common Law

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

Leader Of The City Of Lincoln Council RICHARD METCALFE Deputy Leader Of The City Of Lincoln Council DONALD NANNESTAD And Maintenance Team Leader ADRIAN BULLIMORE Have Committed Offences While In Public Office As You Interact With The Public And Although RICHARD METCALFE And DONALD NANNESTAD Can Claim Expenses Through Public Funds And ADRIAN BULLIMORE Is Paid By Public Funds This Makes You Public Officers And You Have Misconducted Yourself In Public Office.

I Provide More Evidence To The Chief Criminal Constable Of Crimes Committed By The Fake Magistrates They Are Not On Their Judicial Oath As The Magistrates Court Is A Registered Business So The Fake Magistrates Are Committing Section 2 Of The Fraud Act 2006, Kidnapping And False Imprisonment. As The Chief Criminal Constable Is Aware Of What Is Happening And Has Done Nothing About It He Is A accessory To The Crimes Of The Fake Magistrates. 

As I have already issued a criminal indictment against Chief Criminal Constable Chris Haward And all he has done is continue to commit several more offences I will just have to Draw up a second but lengthy Indictment against him. The Police Are Criminals In Uniform!!!

chris.haward@lincs.pnn.police.uk

8/19/2021 at 1:34 PM

NOTICE HAS BEEN SERVED SO IF YOU DO NOT READ THIS EMAIL OR JUST IGNORE IT THAT WILL BE YOUR STUPID FAULT.

 

I WILL BE SENDING THIS EMAIL AND INDICTMENTS TO THE MEDIA AND UPLOADING THEM TO MY ONLINE BLOG.

 

 

To Whom Ever The Criminal It Concerns!

 

The Legal Fiction of Aaron ( Redacted ) Will Not Be Attending The Fake Magistrates Court Operating As A Business Found Through Dun and Bradstreet.

 

 

 

I Have Already Started To Launch A Private Prosecution Against The Fake District Judge Star Chamber PETER VEITS But Also I am also Prosecuting Police Constables of Lincolnshire Police Who I Also Found On Dun And Bradstreet.

The Next Course Of Action Of The Criminals At The Fake Magistrates Court Will Be To Issue A Fake Arrest Warrant. That's Fine With Me As I will Just Draw Up More Criminal Indictments. No Magistrate Is On Their Judicial Oath Thus Committing Fraud Contrary To The Fraud Act 2006 So When The Stasi Act Upon That Fake Arrest Warrant They Will Be Committing At Least 6 Indictable Offence And It Will Just Give Me More Practice Drawing Up More Indictments!!!

 

 

IN THE CROWN COURT AT 

URN NUMBER

Form of Indictment

Criminal Procedure Rules Part 10

B E T W E E N:

REGINA

.v.

FAKE DISTRICT JUDGE PETER VEITS

 Charged As Follows:

 

 

COUNT 1

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Conspiracy To Commit Fraud Contrary To Section 2 of The Fraud Act 2006.

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

On 18,6,21 you PETER VEITS Otherwise Known as DISTRICT JUDGE PETER VEITS Made a False Representation of yourself When I Aaron Marcus Lambert asked to see Your Judicial Oath at The Magistrates Court The Court House 358 High Street Lincoln LN5 7QA You Told Me Your Oath Was Hanging In Your Office You Therefore failed to Prove Your Jurisdiction Thus Representing Yourself Fraudulently.

We will see How Impartial The Corrupt Judiciary Are In Regards To This Matter.

COUNT 2

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Conspiracy to Kidnap contrary to The Common Law

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

On 18,6,21 you PETER VEITS Otherwise Known as DISTRICT JUDGE PETER VEITS wilfully Threaten To Send I Aaron Marcus Lambert To The Cells For No Reason Other Than to sooth your own arrogance At The Same Time You Failed To Prove Your Jurisdiction As DISTRICT JUDGE “THE LAW COMMISSION SIMPLIFICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW”.

KIDNAPPING AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT.

1.5 Kidnapping and False imprisonment are both Common Law offences. They are defined in case Law and not Legislation.

2.1 In the case of LORD BRANDON defined Kidnapping as follows: First nature of the offence is an attack on and infringement of the personal Liberty of an individual, secondly, the offence contains four ingredients as follows: (1) The taking or carrying away of one person by another: (2) by force or fraud: (3) without the consent of the person so taken and carried away: (4) without lawful excuse.

COUNT 3

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

Conspiracy to hold in False Imprisonment contrary to The Common Law

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

On 18,6,21 You PETER VEITS at The magistrates Court The Court House 358 High Street Lincoln LN5 7QA Threaten To Send Aaron Marcus Lambert To The Cells For no Reason other than to Sooth Your own Arrogance and you Failed to Prove you had Jurisdiction to Do so.

“THE LAW COMMISSION SIMPLIFICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW”:

KIDNAPPING AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT

CLARIFICATION OF KIDNAPPING AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT.

PART 3 FALSE IMPRISONMENT.

3.1 False imprisonment is defined as “ The unlawful and intentional or reckless restraint of V’s freedom of movement from a particular Place” .! This definition has been quoted without dispute in many cases.

 

 

Information laid by:

 

Aaron Marcus Lambert

18,8,21

 

To all that it concerns

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL AND NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT APPLIES

Notice of Removal of Implied Right of Access

You are advised to read the following notice thoroughly and carefully. It is a lawful notice. It informs you. It means what it says. I hereby give notice that the implied right of access to the property known as ( Redacted) Lincoln *** *** and surrounding areas, has been removed, along with all associated property including, but not limited to, any private conveyance in respect of the following:

1) ANY employee, principal, agent, third party or representative or any other person acting on behalf of or under the instruction of HER MAJESTY’S COURT SERVICE, or any other CORPORATE BODY (i.e. Company) whosoever named and,

2) ANY POLICE OFFICER who is acting for the CORPORATE POLICE and NOT acting as a Constable for and on behalf of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and her people as expressed in the Oath of Office of all POLICE men and women, that is as Public Servants, upon your Oath of Office to serve "with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property"

COMMON LAW JURISDICTION APPLIES EXCLUSIVELY
 

Please also take notice that the land known as England is a Common Law jurisdiction and any transgression of this notice will be dealt with Private Prosecutions according to, and under, the Common Law.

Any and all access to the above-mentioned properties shall be by strict invitation only and shall be subject to terms and conditions, available by written request.

We do not have, and have never had, a contract. And any permission that you believe you may have from me is hereby withdrawn. If you believe that you have power of attorney to act on my behalf you are hereby fired, and any consent that you believe you may have, tacit or otherwise, is hereby withdrawn. If you feel so inclined as to enforce statutes as a consequence of this matter I will report your conduct to ALL relevant bodies and will pursue Proof of Claim in affidavit form, under your full commercial liability and under the penalty of perjury.

You are deemed to have been served this notice with immediate effect.

In sincerity and honour, without ill-will, frivolity, or vexation,

Lawful and Peaceful Inhabitant of this Dwelling, English Sovereign.
Without any admission of any liability whosoever, and with all Indefeasible Rights reserved.

CASTLE LAW OR CASTLE DOCTRINE!

England and Wales[edit]

In English common law a defendant may seek to avoid criminal or civil liability by claiming that he acted in self-defence.^[56] This requires the jury to determine whether the defendant believed that force was necessary to defend him or herself, their property, or to prevent a crime, and that the force used was reasonable.^[57] While there is no duty to retreat from an attacker and failure to do so is not conclusive evidence that a person did not act in self-defence, it may still be considered by the jury as a relevant factor when assessing the merits of a self-defence claim.^[56] The common law duty to retreat was repealed by the Criminal Law Act 1967. This duty never existed when a person is somewhere he has a lawful right to be, but due to the repeal, now extends to public places, etc.

 

v

Commentaries on the Laws of England,^[11] proclaims that the laws "leave him (the inhabitant) the natural right of killing the aggressor

 

And the law of England has so particular and tender a regard to the immunity of a man's house, that it stiles it his castle, and will never suffer it to be violated with immunity: agreeing herein with the sentiments of ancient Rome, as expressed in the works of Tully;^[12] quid enim sanctius, quid omni religione munitius, quam domus uniusquisque civium?^[13] For this reason no doors can in general be broken open to execute any civil process; though, in criminal causes, the public safety supersedes the private. Hence also in part arises the animadversion of the law upon eaves-droppers, nuisancers, and incendiaries: and to this principle it must be assigned, that a man may assemble people together lawfully without danger of raising a riot, rout, or unlawful assembly, in order to protect and defend his house; which he is not permitted to do in any other case.

— William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 

Not only was the doctrine considered to justify defence against neighbours and criminals, but any of the Crown's agents who attempted to enter without a proper warrant as well.

 

I understand the correct process of a warrant and you never have one according to law you just have your own paperwork or you try and commit  your fraud with electronic devices.

You do this as the business Trading as Lincoln magistrates Court I found through Dun and Bradstreet are committing Fraud.

I have registered my Birth Certificate with the Common Law Court. Vis Legis. Homepage - Common Law Court 

 

Chief Constable Chris Haward Continues To Break The Law.

chris.haward@lincs.pnn.police.uk   

I emailed you before in regards to Tracey Parker from The City of Lincoln Council Who sent me a fake court summons after a dispute for council tax and then they just send out a fake court summons saying that I didn't pay council tax can you explain why You have not arrested Tracey Parker for Fraud and Perjury?

As you have not arrested her you have committed Misconduct in public office Treason, aiding, abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.

 

Perjury Act 1911

12Form of indictment.

(1)In an indictment—

(a)for making any false statement or false representation punishable under this Act; or

(b)for unlawfully, wilfully, falsely, fraudulently, deceitfully, maliciously, or corruptly taking, making, signing, or subscribing any oath, affirmation, solemn declaration, statutory declaration, affidavit, deposition, notice, certificate, or other writing,

it is sufficient to set forth the substance of the offence charged, and before which court or person (if any) the offence was committed without setting forth the proceedings or any part of the proceedings in the course of which the offence was committed, and without setting forth the authority of any court or person before whom the offence was committed.

(2)In an indictment for aiding, abetting, counselling, suborning, or procuring any other person to commit any offence herein-before in this section mentioned, or for conspiring with any other person, . . . F1, to commit any such offence, it is sufficient—

(a)where such offence has been committed, to allege that offence, and then to allege that the defendant procured the commission of that offence; and

(b)where such offence has not been committed, to set forth the substance of the offence charged against the defendant without setting forth any matter or thing which it is unnecessary to aver in the case of an indictment for a false statement or false representation punishable under this Act.

Fraud Act 2006

You are here:

• UK Public General Acts
• 20 

4Fraud by abuse of position

(1)A person is in breach of this section if he—

(a)occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another person,

(b)dishonestly abuses that position, and

(c)intends, by means of the abuse of that position—

(i)to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii)to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

(2)A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.

 

5“Gain” and “loss”

(1)The references to gain and loss in sections 2 to 4 are to be read in accordance with this section.

(2)“Gain” and “loss”—

(a)extend only to gain or loss in money or other property;

(b)include any such gain or loss whether temporary or permanent;

and “property” means any property whether real or personal (including things in action and other intangible property).

(3)“Gain” includes a gain by keeping what one has, as well as a gain by getting what one does not have.

(4)“Loss” includes a loss by not getting what one might get, as well as a loss by parting with what one has.

7Making or supplying articles for use in frauds

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he makes, adapts, supplies or offers to supply any article—

(a)knowing that it is designed or adapted for use in the course of or in connection with fraud, or

(b)intending it to be used to commit, or assist in the commission of, fraud.

(2)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—

(a)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both);

(b)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or to both).

(3)Subsection (2)(a) applies in relation to Northern Ireland as if the reference to 12 months were a reference to 6 months. 

 

 

I am contacting you again as you ignored my last email so already you have committed the offence of ading and abetting!!!!

 

Here's the last email I sent you that you ignored thus aiding and abetting.

 

 

To:chris.haward@lincs.pnn.police.uk      

Fri, 26 Feb at 17:22

 

 

I have sent this Email in regards to your previous Criminal Chief Constable Bill Skelly.

I Emailed him last year in regards to the crimes committed by Tracey Parker at the City of Lincoln Council and the Magistrates Court. The Crimes include Perjury, Fraud, Treason, Contempt of Court.

And as Bill Skelly did nothing about it He is an accessory to their crimes and as he dishonoured his oath to the crown so that dismissed him as a constable and he defrauded the tax payer £160,000 last year.

If any of the rest of us defrauded the tax payers £160,000 we'll soon be arrested and sent to prison and yet Bill Skelly, Tracey Parker and the Fake Magistrates are free people. Can you explain why that is?

 

bill.skelly@lincs.pnn.police.uk

 9/1/20

 

I have sent this email in regards to a Kangaroo Court I Attended 7,1,20.

I am sure you are not interested about this or make any arrests as you are a senior constable in the same corrupt judiciary and if you fail to make any arrests you will also be committing an offence.

 

I got an illegal summons to the "magistrates court" from "The City of Lincoln Council".

So in the kangaroo court I asked Tracey Parker from the council The 2 FAKE magistrates and the so called legal advisor if they support the fake summons and they all did so I tried to show but they was not interested so I read the Courts Act 2003

43 Summons or Warrant for suspected Offender

(1) on an information being laid before a justice of the peace that a person has, or is suspected of having, committed an offence, the justice may issue- 

(a) a summons directed to that person requiring him to appear before a magistrates court to answer the information or

(b) a warrant to arrest that person and bring him before a magistrates court.

Magistrates Courts Act 1980

97 Summons to witness and warrant for his arrest.

(1) where a justice of the peace is satisfied that 

(a) any person in england or wales is likely to be able to give material evidence or produce any document or thing likely to be material evidence at the summary trial of an information or hearing of a complaint f2 by a magistrates court.

 

Please note that it does not say the council can issue a summons and a justice of the peace should always be on their oath when in court.

more offences.

 

as they still support the Fake summons the court and tracey parker are guilty of.

Purjury Act 1911

 

12 Form of Indictment.(1) in an indictment

(a) for making any false statement or false representation punishable under this act or

(b) for unlawfully,wilfully,falsely,fraudulently,miliciously,or corruptly,making,signing,or subscribing any oath affirmation solem declaration statutory declaration affidavit,notice,certificate or other writing,

it issufficient to set forth the substance of the offence charged and before which court or person if any the offence was committed without setting forth the proceedings or any part of the proceedings in the course in which the offence was committed and without setting forth the authority or any court or person before whom the offence was committed.

(2) in an indictment for aiding and abbetting,counselling,suborning,or procuring any other person to commit any offence herein-before in this section mentioned or for conspiring with any other person F1 to commit any such offence it is suffcient-

(a) Where such offence has been committed to allege that offence and then to allege that the defendant procured the commission of that offence and

(b) Where such offence has not been committed to set forth the substance of the offence charged against the defendant without setting forth any matter or thing which it is unnecessary to aver in the case of an indictment for a false statement or false representation punishable under this act.

Section 5 of the purjury act is similar.so if you do not act against the above offences you are guilty of.

Purjury Act 1911

7 Aiders,Abettors,suborners

(1) Every person who aids,abets,counsels,procures or suborns another person to commit an offence against this act shall be liable to be proceeded against indicted, tried and punished as if he were a principal offender.

(2) Every person who incites F1 another person to commit an offence against this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanour and on conviction thereof on indictment shall be liable to imprisonment or to a fine or to both such imprisonment and fine.

 

Also when I was in this kangaroo court tracey parker said she  charged me £22 for a liability order that she applied for the court for so when the 2 FAKE  magistrates retired I said you'll get the liability order as you payed the court for it when the 2 FAKE magistrates returned to the court I failed to rise for then thus not giving them jurisdiction over me but still they awarded her the liability order.(who would of seen that coming?)

I then asked the 2 FAKE  magistrates if they were on their oath the legal advisor said they were so I asked them to prove it and they failed to do so.

so there are plenty of offences I have listed that you will not make any arrests over.

 

 

On Wednesday morning I was arrested at the Kangaroo Court High Street Lincoln.

I was assaulted and robbed The guy was not arrested I was held in false imprisonment the people involved was not arrested. Why were they not arrested?

PC 333 Stevens who did a crap job investigating also made no arrests. So PC 333 stinkie stevens and Pc's bevis and Butt-head are aiding and abetting.

They must get that from their criminal chief constable.

 

If you don't get all these issues resolved very quickly I will require you to attend a recorded interview with me if you fail to comply with the recorded interview you will escalate your offending by perverting the course of justice.

 

I am also requesting bodycam footage on an "sd card"!!! from Wednesday morning under the disclosure rules.#

 

 

College of Policing Limited Leamington Road Ryton-on-Dunsmore Coventry, CV8 3EN Publication date: August 2014 (republished with amends to page 19) © College of Policing Limited (2014

 

Providing copies for the defence In general terms BWV material should be disclosed to the defence in the same manner as other case exhibits. A suitable summary of the evidence will suffice as initial details of the prosecution case. It should only be necessary to provide copies to the defence in the case of actual or anticipated not guilty pleas. Local consultation should take place to ensure that while necessary information is provided as swiftly as possible, resources (both time and physical) are not wasted through providing materials that will not be used. It is important to ensure that copies to be served on the defence do not contain any sensitive information such as the addresses of witnesses. Forces should produce an edited version of the DVD or CD-ROM and appropriately mark the copy as prepared for service on the defence

 

why have you not arrested The Fake magistrates and the clerk to the fake magistrates Michael Seath?

Again you have committed misconduct in public office , Treason, aiding abetting and suborning perverting the course of justice.

 

Why have yo not arrested former criminal chief constable Bill Skelly otherwise known as William Skelly for covering this up.

Again you have committed misconduct in public office, Treason, aiding abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.

 

Why have you not arrested pc's bevis and butthead who arrested me 12th may 21 and pc 333 stevens as they know about the fake magistrates and they didn't arrest the fake magistrates?

So you have committed misconduct in public office, treason, aiding and abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.

 

Why has chief inspector Outen not been arrested for not arresting the fake magistrates not sending me the requested footage from the police station 12th may 21 bodycam footage custody cctv and police interview? Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 The Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (CPIA) introduced the statutory test for disclosing material to the defence in criminal cases 

The police must be able to disclose both used and unused images and demonstrate that this has been done. Deleting any police-generated images (or a third-party’s images in police possession) prior to their respective retention periods may amount to a breach of the Act if they are not then available for disclosure. Forces must retain images relevant to an investigation in accordance with the Code of Practice issued under section 23 of the CPIA. Police Use of Digital Images, section 1.2 Criminal Justice Disclosure contains further information about this requirement. Police-generated digital images should be accompanied by a full audit trail, from the point of capture of the image throughout the whole management process – including when they are passed to the CPS or the defence, or if there is any supervised viewing.

Freedom of Information Act 2000 The Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) grants a general right of access to all types of recorded information held by public authorities, which may include digital images recorded by BWV. The Act provides exemptions to the requirements to disclose information. For further information about the application of the FOIA to the police service and for further detailabout exemptions, see Manual of Guidance: The Freedom of Information Act.

 

Body-Worn Video (college.police.uk)

 

I was in the Kangaroo court in court 6 18th june 21 I asked to see the judicial oath of fake district judge Peter Veits and he failed to show it to confirm he actually has jurisdiction as a district judge. you are going to have to contact the fake district judge and ask for the copy of his judicial oath to prove he had jurisdiction on 18th june 21

 and when you fail to show evidence that he had jurisdiction 18th june 21 he has committed misconduct in public office, treason, fraud and as he threatened to send me to the cells that is conspiracy to commit kidnapping and false imprisonment!

 

As you are not going to arrest the fake district judge and the fake magistrates you are again going to brake the law misconduct in public office, treason, aiding abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.

 

The evidence as to the fake magistrates and the fake district Judge Peter Veits and all the other fake magistrates and judges are fake because the magistrates courts are fake!

Lincoln Magistrates Court is a registered Business I found through Dun and Bradstreet last year.

 

 

 

Lincolnshire Police Have Been Referred To The Professional Standards Department And The IOPC

If You are looking for helpful video's part 2 go to the January 2020 archive.

If any of you can't get on this blog on laptop or pc you need to use the long line address bar at the top of your screen and type in.

https://kangaroocourtuk.blogspot.com  

Here's the police confirming they are under investigation. Please note when you report the police for breaking the law they will say you made a complaint they twist everything you say!

LincsPSDComplaints 

• 5/17/2021 at 10:24 AM

Dear Mr (Redacted)

 

We are writing to acknowledge your complaint and confirm it has been received within the Professional Standards Department.

 

We are sorry to hear that you are dissatisfied with the actions of Lincolnshire Police.

 

We have read your email below and identified two complaints that we will forward on for assessment by the Appropriate Authority within this department.

 

1. Former CC Bill Skelly failed to respond to emails and take appropriate action against Tracey Parker and the Magistrates Court.
2. Officers failed to take appropriate action against offenders on 12/05/21.

And Here again is hidden camera footage I uploaded to helpful video's part 2 Filmed at Plymouth Magistrates Court. It's only on for just over a minute it's not the best quality footage and you might want to pump up the volume.

Lousy Lincolnshire branch of the Stasi have been referred to the professional standards department and now the IOPC.

Apparently the IOPC is the independent office for police conduct. I'll believe it when I see it.

Lousy Lincolnshire Stasi have been referred to the professional standards department and IOPC as they have been aiding and abetting the crimes I have been informing them of since last year. Since last year we have had a change of chief constables and yet the crimes they commit stay the same.

Last Wednesday (12th may) I was arrested outside The Kangaroo Court High Street Lincoln on suspicion of causing criminal damage.

Despite the fact I was assaulted and robbed by 1 of the security at the kangaroo court and 3 others held me in false imprisonment I was the only one arrested so PC'S Beavis and Butthead are aiding and abetting their crimes and committed treason.

After spending 8 hours in a police cell the investigating constable PC 333 Stinky Stevens gave me a 15 minute interview to ask me about 3 photo's. It took her 8 hours to decide to interview me after spending 8 hours looking at 3 photo's. I told Stinky Stevens I did not even brake anything. 333 Stinky Stevens Defined Criminal Damage as deliberately causing reckless criminal damage. What sort of definition is that?

Despite the fact Stinky Stevens don't seem to know what criminal damage actually is she charged me with criminal damage. I asked her why the 4 security that committed offences against me were not arrested she replied I'm not dealing with that I'm dealing with this even though it's all part of the same thing. So PC Stevens has joined her colleagues in committing crimes. She has committed aiding and abetting, Treason as she has not fulfilled her role according to the oath she took as constable I will prevent all offences against people and not some offences against some people and she has also committed misconduct in public office. I have written to the dopey git telling her I am investigating her and if she don't attend a recorded interview with me during the week commencing 17th may 2021 then she is perverting the course of justice.

During an interview with PC 333 Stevens after she ended the skype call with the duty solicitor I asked

PC 333 Stevens why she didn't arrest the security and the Magistrates she responded by pointing at the recording machine and said SHUSH! I think it's still recording.

Has PC Stevens been arrested for her crimes? Nope Lincolnshire Stasi cover up her crimes Covering up the crimes of the Police by The so called Professional standards department is that routine it seems to be standard procedure up and down the country.

It is no wonder I say the Stasi are criminals in uniform and they have been referred to the professional standards department and the IOPC.

PC 333 Stevens is the sort of person who thinks PC World is a planet.

With all the crimes that have been committed by Lincolnshire Stasi, Now would be the perfect time for them to change their motto.

I have contacted Marc Jones the Lincolnshire police and crime commissioner about this he does what he usually does he hits the delete button so he can earn an easy paycheque. It is the job of the crime commissioner to investigate the police and you know that's not true when his office is at Lincolnshire Police Headquarters.

For the benefit of those who can't be bothered to go back to the beginning of my blog to see what I'm on about.

The city of Lincoln council issued me with a fake court summons over council tax dispute.                     according to the magistrates courts act only a magistrate or clerk to a magistrate can issue a court summons. So that is fraud and perjury.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/1-2/6/section/12 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/43/section/1 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/43/section/97 

The Fake magistrates said they supported the fake summons so they committed Treason, Fraud, Contempt of Court, Aiding Abetting and Suborning, Misconduct in Public Office.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/1-2/6/section/7

Both former and current chief constables also are aiding abetting this as I e-mailed them and did nothing about it. A few more constables I told about it also aid and abet this as I also told them and they did nothing. Not the Police service I was hoping for.

Since last year I have been Trying To contact Karl McCartney MP He has not got back so he too is Aiding and Abetting.

I have contacted Police and Crime Commissioner Marc Jones about this He too has done nothing So He also is Aiding and Abetting.

The Police recently referred themselves to their own Professional Standards Department. The Police are investigating themselves just like they did just after the Sarah Everard Vigil and they more or less said We investigated ourselves and we found we did nothing wrong.

I referred Lincolnshire Police to the IOPC whether they do something or not I don't Know.

The IOPC investigate some Police but I have also heard criticisms about the IOPC. 

Here's a Rogues Gallery of A Few Wanted Faces.

Former Criminal Chief Constable Now Fugitive Bill Skelly.

Current Criminal Chief Constable Chris Haward.

STAR CHAMBER Criminal Karl McCartney MP.

Role of a Police and Crime Commissioner

• Tweet

Criminal Crime Commissioner Marc Jones Who's Job it is to hold Lincolnshire Police and the Chief Constable account but not when you E-mail Marc Jones About Lincolnshire Police and The Chief Constable all of a sudden he can't be bothered to do his job as he should. He'll read your e-mail think to himself  I can't be bothered with that hit the delete button so he can earn an easy paycheque!!! £66,000

The Chief Constable is not exactly earning his £161,000.

Criminal Karl McCartney is not exactly earning his £81,000 Paycheque.

I have put in a Subject Access request with the police in regards to body cam footage when they arrested me for criminal damage What I think will happen is they will say the person who is dealing with data was off ill or on annual leave or what ever story they will come up with and say this has gone past the time limit we can hold data so we had to delete the video.

So it can't be used against them.

I have sent this Email to the police in Regards to the cover up of  their investigation for corruption.

LincsPSD@lincs.pnn.police.uk 

• 6/2/2021 at 9:31 AM

  
  

Can I get an update on the cover up (Investigation) inregards to an E-mail mail I sent to Criminal Chief Constable Chris Haward in regards to the crimes of Former Criminal Chief Constable Bill Skelly and Tracey Parker From the City of Lincoln Council and the corrupt Magistrates.

Tracey Parker sent out fake summons to appear at the magistrates That's Perjury and fraud and she bribes the corrupt Magistrates for a liability order.

The Corrupt magistrates support the fake summons thus aiding abetting and suborning Tracey Parkers offences also the Corrupt magistrates committed Treason Fraud Contempt of Court Misconduct in Public office.

Why has Tracey Parker, The Magistrates, The Clerk to the Magistrates Micheal Seath and Bill Skelly Not been arrested?

If you can give me an update on your Arse Covering Exercise That'll Be Great.

 

Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (legislation.gov.uk) 

 

Perjury Act 1911 (legislation.gov.uk)  Section 12

 

Perjury Act 1911 (legislation.gov.uk)  Section 7

 

bill.skelly@lincs.pnn.police.uk

 9/1/20

 

I have sent this email in regards to a Kangaroo Court I Attended 7,1,20.

I am sure you are not interested about this or make any arrests as you are a senior constable in the same corrupt judiciary and if you fail to make any arrests you will also be committing an offence.

 

I got an illegal summons to the "magistrates court" from "The City of Lincoln Council".

So in the kangaroo court I asked Tracey Parker from the council The 2 FAKE magistrates and the so called legal advisor if they support the fake summons and they all did so I tried to show but they was not interested so I read the Courts Act 2003

43 Summons or Warrant for suspected Offender

(1) on an information being laid before a justice of the peace that a person has, or is suspected of having, committed an offence, the justice may issue- 

(a) a summons directed to that person requiring him to appear before a magistrates court to answer the information or

(b) a warrant to arrest that person and bring him before a magistrates court.

Magistrates Courts Act 1980

97 Summons to witness and warrant for his arrest.

(1) where a justice of the peace is satisfied that 

(a) any person in england or wales is likely to be able to give material evidence or produce any document or thing likely to be material evidence at the summary trial of an information or hearing of a complaint f2 by a magistrates court.

 

Please note that it does not say the council can issue a summons and a justice of the peace should always be on their oath when in court.

more offences.

 

as they still support the Fake summons the court and tracey parker are guilty of.

Purjury Act 1911

 

12 Form of Indictment.(1) in an indictment

(a) for making any false statement or false representation punishable under this act or

(b) for unlawfully,wilfully,falsely,fraudulently,miliciously,or corruptly,making,signing,or subscribing any oath affirmation solem declaration statutory declaration affidavit,notice,certificate or other writing,

it issufficient to set forth the substance of the offence charged and before which court or person if any the offence was committed without setting forth the proceedings or any part of the proceedings in the course in which the offence was committed and without setting forth the authority or any court or person before whom the offence was committed.

(2) in an indictment for aiding and abbetting,counselling,suborning,or procuring any other person to commit any offence herein-before in this section mentioned or for conspiring with any other person F1 to commit any such offence it is suffcient-

(a) Where such offence has been committed to allege that offence and then to allege that the defendant procured the commission of that offence and

(b) Where such offence has not been committed to set forth the substance of the offence charged against the defendant without setting forth any matter or thing which it is unnecessary to aver in the case of an indictment for a false statement or false representation punishable under this act.

Section 5 of the purjury act is similar.so if you do not act against the above offences you are guilty of.

Purjury Act 1911

7 Aiders,Abettors,suborners

(1) Every person who aiders,abets,counsels,procures or suborns another person to commit an offence against this act shall be liable to be proceeded against indicted, tried and punished as if he were a principal offender.

(2) Every person who incites F1 another person to commit an offence against this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanour and on conviction thereof on indictment shall be liable to imprisonment or to a fine or to both such imprisonment and fine.

 

Also when I was in this kangaroo court tracey parker said she  charged me £22 for a liability order that she applied for the court for so when the 2 FAKE  magistrates retired I said you'll get the liability order as you payed the court for it when the 2 FAKE magistrates returned to the court I failed to rise for then thus not giving them jurisdiction over me but still they awarded her the liability order.(who would of seen that coming?)

I then asked the 2 FAKE  magistrates if they were on their oath the legal advisor said they were so I asked them to prove it and they failed to do so.

so there are plenty of offences I have listed that you will not make any arrests over.

 

Here's the response from the corrupt police. I asked them about what happened last year January 2020 and they responded about what happened 12th may 2021. They don't want to talk about what happened with Tracey Parker From the City of Lincoln Council, The Corrupt Magistrates and The Then Chief Constable Bill Skelly. Do I need anymore Evidence of their Corruption? 

Just to let you all know 12th may 2021 I did go to the kangaroo court high street Lincoln and start spray painting and I only got as far as spraying KANGAR before I was assaulted by G4S Security.

I was spray painting as it is a kangaroo court it's not a real court it is a registered business and the so-called magistrates are just fraudsters with no jurisdiction whatsoever and yet on a daily basis they fine people give them community service and send people to prison. sending people to prison without jurisdiction to do so is kidnapping and false imprisonment and they take back handers from Tracey Parker of the city of Lincoln council in return for liability orders. So the emails below the police responded to the events on 12th may even though I asked them in regards to the crimes committed January 2020 and I put at the top of this page when the Police are involved in crimes they just twist everything you say.

Update!!

Wednesday 16 June 2021 I had a zoom call with a solicitor in regards to what happened on 12th may and she read to me a police statement from a G4S security who assaulted and robbed me and I said to her wait a minute the police said to me in an email ( see below ) That they don't know what I'm talking about there is no evidence of the allegations I made against G4S security even though there's a camera on the high street outside the court and CCTV on a takeaway next to the kangaroo court and the CCTV is pointing at the court then the solicitor started smiling as she knows about the CCTV and you just read to me a police statement that the G4S security made and yet the police claim there's no evidence.

Good morning Mr 

 

We responded to you by email on 21/05/2021 to advise you that no action was to be taken regarding your complaint.

 

The letter attached to that email detailed your right to request a review of this decision by the Police and Crime Commissioner, and provided contact details should you wish to apply for a review.

 

I have attached a copy of this letter for your information, which stipulates that any review request must be received by 22/06/2021.

 

Regards

Mr Lambert

Via email

21 May 2021                                                            

Dear Mr Lambert

Complaint Against Police - Our ref: CO/00422/21

I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence received in this department on 17/05/2021. I regret that you have had to notify us of your dissatisfaction in this matter.

Your complaint has been formally recorded under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002.

However, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) statutory guidance (paragraph 12.10) states that in some circumstances it may not be reasonable and proportionate to take further action with a complaint after recording it.

One of these circumstances is where:

The complaint contains too little information to be able to progress any enquiries, and our attempts to clarify it with you have been unsuccessful.

It is unclear exactly what the complainant is complaining about as he was arrested for causing criminal damage to the magistrate’s court by spray painting it. There is nothing to indicate a robbery and he refuses to engage to clarify what the circumstances of his complaint are. The other matters in his correspondence relate to the judicial system and City of Lincoln council and are not matters for the police complaints system.

For this reason, although your complaint has been recorded, no further action will be taken on this occasion.

Your right of review

You have the right to apply for a review of the outcome of the complaint. Your review will be considered by the Police and Crime Commissioner for Lincolnshire.

Information about how to apply for a review can be found on the Lincolnshire Police and Crime Commissioner’s website: www.lincolnshire-pcc.gov.uk. The website contains a form that you can download and print off, or you can contact the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner (OPCC) in the following ways:

Email: complaints-pcc@lincs.pnn.police.uk

Write to: The Police and Crime Commissioner, Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner, Deepdale Lane, Nettleham, Lincoln, LN2 2LT

If you need help with your application, please contact the Police and Crime Commissioners Office on telephone: 01522 947192. I draw your attention to the fact that the OPCC must receive any appeal within 29 days of the date of this letter, that being 22/06/2021.

Please note that by submitting a request for a review, any information generated and reviewed as part of your complaint will then be shared with the OPCC and their third party provider (Sancus Solutions Ltd), to enable them to investigate and review your case appropriately. ¹ More information about complaint reviews can be found on the IOPC website: www.policeconduct.gov.uk.

Yours sincerely

Chief Inspector Outen

Deputy Head of Professional Standards

1 The legal basis for this information sharing is under Articles 6(1)(c) & (e) and Articles 9(2)(g) & Sch1 Part 2(8) and Sch1, Part 3(36) of the Data Protection Act 2018 and also under the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011. For further information on our legal basis for sharing information, please see Lincolnshire Police’s Privacy Notice available via the below link:

https://www.lincs.police.uk/resource-library/data-protection/privacy-notice/ 

The IOPC who seem to be the corrupt police protection service and is covering up the crimes of  Lincolnshire branch of the Stasi who are criminals in uniform have very bad ratings on the link below.

https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.policeconduct.gov.uk 

Friday 18th June 2021 I was in the Kangaroo court 358 high street Lincoln.

I asked the guy on the bench if he was on his judicial oath he said he was I asked to see it and after a bit of thinking he said no because it is hanging in my office. So that means he's not on his oath I asked for his name I couldn't understand him as he was behind a big screen like you have at the post office Peter Veits he said I'm a District Judge. But as he's not on his oath He's a fake District Judge!!!

The fake District Judge Peter Veits Threatened to send me to the cells if I didn't do what he said. Forcing me to and holding me in the cells when he has no Jurisdiction over me to do so Is conspiracy to Kidnap and false imprisonment.

Below under quotation I copied a definition of Kidnapping and false imprisonment.

Report the crimes of the fake Magistrates and fake district judges to the police and they will ignore you thus aiding and abetting others committing crimes as usual!!!

"THE LAW COMMISSION SIMPLIFICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW: KIDNAPPING AND RELATED OFFENCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – KIDNAPPING AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT

CLARIFICATION OF KIDNAPPING AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT 1.5 Kidnapping and false imprisonment are both common law offences. They are defined in case law, and not in legislation.

2.1 In the case of D1 Lord Brandon defined kidnapping as follows: First, the nature of the offence is an attack on and infringement of the personal liberty of an individual. Secondly, the offence contains four ingredients as follows: (1) the taking or carrying away of one person by another; (2) by force or fraud; (3) without the consent of the person so taken and carried away; and (4) without lawful excuse. 

PART 3 FALSE IMPRISONMENT 3.1 False imprisonment is defined as “the unlawful and intentional or reckless restraint of V’s freedom of movement from a particular place”.1 This definition has been quoted without dispute in many cases.2 "

I got unconditional Bail until August.

I don't know how I got bail as I was not onboard a ship.

. :
.