as they still support the Fake summons the court and tracey parker are guilty of.
12 Form of Indictment.(1) in an indictment
(a) for making any false statement or false representation punishable under this act or
(b) for unlawfully,wilfully,falsely,fraudulently,miliciously,or corruptly,making,signing,or subscribing any oath affirmation solem declaration statutory declaration affidavit,notice,certificate or other writing,
it issufficient to set forth the substance of the offence charged and before which court or person if any the offence was committed without setting forth the proceedings or any part of the proceedings in the course in which the offence was committed and without setting forth the authority or any court or person before whom the offence was committed.
(2) in an indictment for aiding and abbetting,counselling,suborning,or procuring any other person to commit any offence herein-before in this section mentioned or for conspiring with any other person F1 to commit any such offence it is suffcient-
(a) Where such offence has been committed to allege that offence and then to allege that the defendant procured the commission of that offence and
(b) Where such offence has not been committed to set forth the substance of the offence charged against the defendant without setting forth any matter or thing which it is unnecessary to aver in the case of an indictment for a false statement or false representation punishable under this act.
Section 5 of the purjury act is similar.so if you do not act against the above offences you are guilty of.
Purjury Act 1911
7 Aiders,Abettors,suborners
(1) Every person who aids,abets,counsels,procures or suborns another person to commit an offence against this act shall be liable to be proceeded against indicted, tried and punished as if he were a principal offender.
(2) Every person who incites F1 another person to commit an offence against this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanour and on conviction thereof on indictment shall be liable to imprisonment or to a fine or to both such imprisonment and fine.
Also when I was in this kangaroo court tracey parker said she charged me £22 for a liability order that she applied for the court for so when the 2 FAKE magistrates retired I said you'll get the liability order as you payed the court for it when the 2 FAKE magistrates returned to the court I failed to rise for then thus not giving them jurisdiction over me but still they awarded her the liability order.(who would of seen that coming?)
I then asked the 2 FAKE magistrates if they were on their oath the legal advisor said they were so I asked them to prove it and they failed to do so.
so there are plenty of offences I have listed that you will not make any arrests over.
On Wednesday morning I was arrested at the Kangaroo Court High Street Lincoln.
I was assaulted and robbed The guy was not arrested I was held in false imprisonment the people involved was not arrested. Why were they not arrested?
PC 333 Stevens who did a crap job investigating also made no arrests. So PC 333 stinkie stevens and Pc's bevis and Butt-head are aiding and abetting.
They must get that from their criminal chief constable.
If you don't get all these issues resolved very quickly I will require you to attend a recorded interview with me if you fail to comply with the recorded interview you will escalate your offending by perverting the course of justice.
I am also requesting bodycam footage on an "sd card"!!! from Wednesday morning under the disclosure rules.#
College of Policing Limited Leamington Road Ryton-on-Dunsmore Coventry, CV8 3EN Publication date: August 2014 (republished with amends to page 19) © College of Policing Limited (2014
Providing copies for the defence In general terms BWV material should be disclosed to the defence in the same manner as other case exhibits. A suitable summary of the evidence will suffice as initial details of the prosecution case. It should only be necessary to provide copies to the defence in the case of actual or anticipated not guilty pleas. Local consultation should take place to ensure that while necessary information is provided as swiftly as possible, resources (both time and physical) are not wasted through providing materials that will not be used. It is important to ensure that copies to be served on the defence do not contain any sensitive information such as the addresses of witnesses. Forces should produce an edited version of the DVD or CD-ROM and appropriately mark the copy as prepared for service on the defence
why have you not arrested The Fake magistrates and the clerk to the fake magistrates Michael Seath?
Again you have committed misconduct in public office , Treason, aiding abetting and suborning perverting the course of justice.
Why have yo not arrested former criminal chief constable Bill Skelly otherwise known as William Skelly for covering this up.
Again you have committed misconduct in public office, Treason, aiding abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.
Why have you not arrested pc's bevis and butthead who arrested me 12th may 21 and pc 333 stevens as they know about the fake magistrates and they didn't arrest the fake magistrates?
So you have committed misconduct in public office, treason, aiding and abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.
Why has chief inspector Outen not been arrested for not arresting the fake magistrates not sending me the requested footage from the police station 12th may 21 bodycam footage custody cctv and police interview? Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 The Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (CPIA) introduced the statutory test for disclosing material to the defence in criminal cases
The police must be able to disclose both used and unused images and demonstrate that this has been done. Deleting any police-generated images (or a third-party’s images in police possession) prior to their respective retention periods may amount to a breach of the Act if they are not then available for disclosure. Forces must retain images relevant to an investigation in accordance with the Code of Practice issued under section 23 of the CPIA. Police Use of Digital Images, section 1.2 Criminal Justice Disclosure contains further information about this requirement. Police-generated digital images should be accompanied by a full audit trail, from the point of capture of the image throughout the whole management process – including when they are passed to the CPS or the defence, or if there is any supervised viewing.
Freedom of Information Act 2000 The Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) grants a general right of access to all types of recorded information held by public authorities, which may include digital images recorded by BWV. The Act provides exemptions to the requirements to disclose information. For further information about the application of the FOIA to the police service and for further detailabout exemptions, see Manual of Guidance: The Freedom of Information Act.
I was in the Kangaroo court in court 6 18th june 21 I asked to see the judicial oath of fake district judge Peter Veits and he failed to show it to confirm he actually has jurisdiction as a district judge. you are going to have to contact the fake district judge and ask for the copy of his judicial oath to prove he had jurisdiction on 18th june 21
and when you fail to show evidence that he had jurisdiction 18th june 21 he has committed misconduct in public office, treason, fraud and as he threatened to send me to the cells that is conspiracy to commit kidnapping and false imprisonment!
As you are not going to arrest the fake district judge and the fake magistrates you are again going to brake the law misconduct in public office, treason, aiding abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.
The evidence as to the fake magistrates and the fake district Judge Peter Veits and all the other fake magistrates and judges are fake because the magistrates courts are fake!
Lincoln Magistrates Court is a registered Business I found through Dun and Bradstreet last year.
No comments:
Post a Comment