Chief Constable Chris Haward Continues To Break The Law.

chris.haward@lincs.pnn.police.uk   

I emailed you before in regards to Tracey Parker from The City of Lincoln Council Who sent me a fake court summons after a dispute for council tax and then they just send out a fake court summons saying that I didn't pay council tax can you explain why You have not arrested Tracey Parker for Fraud and Perjury?

As you have not arrested her you have committed Misconduct in public office Treason, aiding, abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.

 

Perjury Act 1911

12Form of indictment.

(1)In an indictment—

(a)for making any false statement or false representation punishable under this Act; or

(b)for unlawfully, wilfully, falsely, fraudulently, deceitfully, maliciously, or corruptly taking, making, signing, or subscribing any oath, affirmation, solemn declaration, statutory declaration, affidavit, deposition, notice, certificate, or other writing,

it is sufficient to set forth the substance of the offence charged, and before which court or person (if any) the offence was committed without setting forth the proceedings or any part of the proceedings in the course of which the offence was committed, and without setting forth the authority of any court or person before whom the offence was committed.

(2)In an indictment for aiding, abetting, counselling, suborning, or procuring any other person to commit any offence herein-before in this section mentioned, or for conspiring with any other person, . . . F1, to commit any such offence, it is sufficient—

(a)where such offence has been committed, to allege that offence, and then to allege that the defendant procured the commission of that offence; and

(b)where such offence has not been committed, to set forth the substance of the offence charged against the defendant without setting forth any matter or thing which it is unnecessary to aver in the case of an indictment for a false statement or false representation punishable under this Act.

Fraud Act 2006

You are here:

• UK Public General Acts
• 20 

4Fraud by abuse of position

(1)A person is in breach of this section if he—

(a)occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another person,

(b)dishonestly abuses that position, and

(c)intends, by means of the abuse of that position—

(i)to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii)to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

(2)A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.

 

5“Gain” and “loss”

(1)The references to gain and loss in sections 2 to 4 are to be read in accordance with this section.

(2)“Gain” and “loss”—

(a)extend only to gain or loss in money or other property;

(b)include any such gain or loss whether temporary or permanent;

and “property” means any property whether real or personal (including things in action and other intangible property).

(3)“Gain” includes a gain by keeping what one has, as well as a gain by getting what one does not have.

(4)“Loss” includes a loss by not getting what one might get, as well as a loss by parting with what one has.

7Making or supplying articles for use in frauds

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he makes, adapts, supplies or offers to supply any article—

(a)knowing that it is designed or adapted for use in the course of or in connection with fraud, or

(b)intending it to be used to commit, or assist in the commission of, fraud.

(2)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—

(a)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both);

(b)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or to both).

(3)Subsection (2)(a) applies in relation to Northern Ireland as if the reference to 12 months were a reference to 6 months. 

 

 

I am contacting you again as you ignored my last email so already you have committed the offence of ading and abetting!!!!

 

Here's the last email I sent you that you ignored thus aiding and abetting.

 

 

To:chris.haward@lincs.pnn.police.uk      

Fri, 26 Feb at 17:22

 

 

I have sent this Email in regards to your previous Criminal Chief Constable Bill Skelly.

I Emailed him last year in regards to the crimes committed by Tracey Parker at the City of Lincoln Council and the Magistrates Court. The Crimes include Perjury, Fraud, Treason, Contempt of Court.

And as Bill Skelly did nothing about it He is an accessory to their crimes and as he dishonoured his oath to the crown so that dismissed him as a constable and he defrauded the tax payer £160,000 last year.

If any of the rest of us defrauded the tax payers £160,000 we'll soon be arrested and sent to prison and yet Bill Skelly, Tracey Parker and the Fake Magistrates are free people. Can you explain why that is?

 

bill.skelly@lincs.pnn.police.uk

 9/1/20

 

I have sent this email in regards to a Kangaroo Court I Attended 7,1,20.

I am sure you are not interested about this or make any arrests as you are a senior constable in the same corrupt judiciary and if you fail to make any arrests you will also be committing an offence.

 

I got an illegal summons to the "magistrates court" from "The City of Lincoln Council".

So in the kangaroo court I asked Tracey Parker from the council The 2 FAKE magistrates and the so called legal advisor if they support the fake summons and they all did so I tried to show but they was not interested so I read the Courts Act 2003

43 Summons or Warrant for suspected Offender

(1) on an information being laid before a justice of the peace that a person has, or is suspected of having, committed an offence, the justice may issue- 

(a) a summons directed to that person requiring him to appear before a magistrates court to answer the information or

(b) a warrant to arrest that person and bring him before a magistrates court.

Magistrates Courts Act 1980

97 Summons to witness and warrant for his arrest.

(1) where a justice of the peace is satisfied that 

(a) any person in england or wales is likely to be able to give material evidence or produce any document or thing likely to be material evidence at the summary trial of an information or hearing of a complaint f2 by a magistrates court.

 

Please note that it does not say the council can issue a summons and a justice of the peace should always be on their oath when in court.

more offences.

 

as they still support the Fake summons the court and tracey parker are guilty of.

Purjury Act 1911

 

12 Form of Indictment.(1) in an indictment

(a) for making any false statement or false representation punishable under this act or

(b) for unlawfully,wilfully,falsely,fraudulently,miliciously,or corruptly,making,signing,or subscribing any oath affirmation solem declaration statutory declaration affidavit,notice,certificate or other writing,

it issufficient to set forth the substance of the offence charged and before which court or person if any the offence was committed without setting forth the proceedings or any part of the proceedings in the course in which the offence was committed and without setting forth the authority or any court or person before whom the offence was committed.

(2) in an indictment for aiding and abbetting,counselling,suborning,or procuring any other person to commit any offence herein-before in this section mentioned or for conspiring with any other person F1 to commit any such offence it is suffcient-

(a) Where such offence has been committed to allege that offence and then to allege that the defendant procured the commission of that offence and

(b) Where such offence has not been committed to set forth the substance of the offence charged against the defendant without setting forth any matter or thing which it is unnecessary to aver in the case of an indictment for a false statement or false representation punishable under this act.

Section 5 of the purjury act is similar.so if you do not act against the above offences you are guilty of.

Purjury Act 1911

7 Aiders,Abettors,suborners

(1) Every person who aids,abets,counsels,procures or suborns another person to commit an offence against this act shall be liable to be proceeded against indicted, tried and punished as if he were a principal offender.

(2) Every person who incites F1 another person to commit an offence against this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanour and on conviction thereof on indictment shall be liable to imprisonment or to a fine or to both such imprisonment and fine.

 

Also when I was in this kangaroo court tracey parker said she  charged me £22 for a liability order that she applied for the court for so when the 2 FAKE  magistrates retired I said you'll get the liability order as you payed the court for it when the 2 FAKE magistrates returned to the court I failed to rise for then thus not giving them jurisdiction over me but still they awarded her the liability order.(who would of seen that coming?)

I then asked the 2 FAKE  magistrates if they were on their oath the legal advisor said they were so I asked them to prove it and they failed to do so.

so there are plenty of offences I have listed that you will not make any arrests over.

 

 

On Wednesday morning I was arrested at the Kangaroo Court High Street Lincoln.

I was assaulted and robbed The guy was not arrested I was held in false imprisonment the people involved was not arrested. Why were they not arrested?

PC 333 Stevens who did a crap job investigating also made no arrests. So PC 333 stinkie stevens and Pc's bevis and Butt-head are aiding and abetting.

They must get that from their criminal chief constable.

 

If you don't get all these issues resolved very quickly I will require you to attend a recorded interview with me if you fail to comply with the recorded interview you will escalate your offending by perverting the course of justice.

 

I am also requesting bodycam footage on an "sd card"!!! from Wednesday morning under the disclosure rules.#

 

 

College of Policing Limited Leamington Road Ryton-on-Dunsmore Coventry, CV8 3EN Publication date: August 2014 (republished with amends to page 19) © College of Policing Limited (2014

 

Providing copies for the defence In general terms BWV material should be disclosed to the defence in the same manner as other case exhibits. A suitable summary of the evidence will suffice as initial details of the prosecution case. It should only be necessary to provide copies to the defence in the case of actual or anticipated not guilty pleas. Local consultation should take place to ensure that while necessary information is provided as swiftly as possible, resources (both time and physical) are not wasted through providing materials that will not be used. It is important to ensure that copies to be served on the defence do not contain any sensitive information such as the addresses of witnesses. Forces should produce an edited version of the DVD or CD-ROM and appropriately mark the copy as prepared for service on the defence

 

why have you not arrested The Fake magistrates and the clerk to the fake magistrates Michael Seath?

Again you have committed misconduct in public office , Treason, aiding abetting and suborning perverting the course of justice.

 

Why have yo not arrested former criminal chief constable Bill Skelly otherwise known as William Skelly for covering this up.

Again you have committed misconduct in public office, Treason, aiding abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.

 

Why have you not arrested pc's bevis and butthead who arrested me 12th may 21 and pc 333 stevens as they know about the fake magistrates and they didn't arrest the fake magistrates?

So you have committed misconduct in public office, treason, aiding and abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.

 

Why has chief inspector Outen not been arrested for not arresting the fake magistrates not sending me the requested footage from the police station 12th may 21 bodycam footage custody cctv and police interview? Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 The Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (CPIA) introduced the statutory test for disclosing material to the defence in criminal cases 

The police must be able to disclose both used and unused images and demonstrate that this has been done. Deleting any police-generated images (or a third-party’s images in police possession) prior to their respective retention periods may amount to a breach of the Act if they are not then available for disclosure. Forces must retain images relevant to an investigation in accordance with the Code of Practice issued under section 23 of the CPIA. Police Use of Digital Images, section 1.2 Criminal Justice Disclosure contains further information about this requirement. Police-generated digital images should be accompanied by a full audit trail, from the point of capture of the image throughout the whole management process – including when they are passed to the CPS or the defence, or if there is any supervised viewing.

Freedom of Information Act 2000 The Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) grants a general right of access to all types of recorded information held by public authorities, which may include digital images recorded by BWV. The Act provides exemptions to the requirements to disclose information. For further information about the application of the FOIA to the police service and for further detailabout exemptions, see Manual of Guidance: The Freedom of Information Act.

 

Body-Worn Video (college.police.uk)

 

I was in the Kangaroo court in court 6 18th june 21 I asked to see the judicial oath of fake district judge Peter Veits and he failed to show it to confirm he actually has jurisdiction as a district judge. you are going to have to contact the fake district judge and ask for the copy of his judicial oath to prove he had jurisdiction on 18th june 21

 and when you fail to show evidence that he had jurisdiction 18th june 21 he has committed misconduct in public office, treason, fraud and as he threatened to send me to the cells that is conspiracy to commit kidnapping and false imprisonment!

 

As you are not going to arrest the fake district judge and the fake magistrates you are again going to brake the law misconduct in public office, treason, aiding abetting and suborning and perverting the course of justice.

 

The evidence as to the fake magistrates and the fake district Judge Peter Veits and all the other fake magistrates and judges are fake because the magistrates courts are fake!

Lincoln Magistrates Court is a registered Business I found through Dun and Bradstreet last year.