Friday, 14 February 2020

Conclusion.

I have exposed the corrupt courts in this country. I have shared with you my story and have uploaded videos of our corrupt courts. You need to change your perspective about  our country. It's not a shining beacon of hope!
Most of the people who work in the courts are criminals. The courts are hired. All courts are commercial but they are supposed to be courts of common law of the land. The judges and magistrates are required to swear an oath to the crown which represents common law of the land.
Constables also swear an oath to the crown but they enforce acts and statutes.
If you are ever confronted by a constable for an act you should challenge them if they are on their oath and that's an oath to enforce common law of the land. You should search for constables oath under police reform act 2002.

83 Attestation of constables


For Schedule 4 to the 1996 Act there shall be substituted—


SCHEDULE 4 Form of Declaration

’I....................of....................do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will, to the best of my skill and knowledge, discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.’




So that's proof you don't need to follow acts the constables are only  bound by common law so you'll always need to challenge them on that.
I suggest you down load that video on youtube I told you about.

Strawman the true nature of the cage (official)

Despite the above oath the stasi still break the law by enforcing an act. first video challenging the stasi to be on their oath but they are only interested in acts which are not on their oath.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j54j2XiQM9g part 2 the stasi go against their oath break a window cause offence against property assault offence against people treason going against their oath. so they break the law to enforce an act. "nice"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjP7qLs5Bjc they are criminals in uniform!!!


The only way I know how to download from youtube with viddly download viddly to your taskbar. type the video into youtube strawman the true nature of the cage (official)
left click on the URL bar at the top of your screen when it highlights blue right click on copy on your taskbar click on v or hidden icons and download video mp4.
You all should do what I have done I have registered my birth certificate with the common law court to confirm I am a living man. Not a legal fiction person (birth certificate).
Acts and statutes are only given the force of law by the consent of the governed.
So you always have the right not to consent.
Council tax is the local government finance act 1992. So if you do not consent to pay your council tax as it is an act the council will issue you with a summons to court.
I have uploaded the magistrate courts act1980: summons to court and warrant for arrest and it does not say the council can summons you to court so they have committed perjury I have uploaded section 12 of the perjury act when I went to court I asked the court if they  support the fake summons they did so they have committed section 7 of the perjury act and contempt of court. as these people like their acts and statutes I use the acts and statutes against them. I contacted Robert Buckland QC MP Who is the Lord Chancellor who's  job it is to remove any lay justice. He has not so he's a criminal.

11Resignation and removal of lay justices



(1)A lay justice may resign his office at any time.


(2)The Lord Chancellor may [F1, with the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice,] remove a lay justice from his office by an instrument on behalf and in the name of Her Majesty—


(a)on the ground of incapacity or misbehaviour,


(b)on the ground of a persistent failure to meet such standards of competence as are prescribed by a direction given by the Lord Chancellor [F2with the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice] , or


(c)if he is satisfied that the lay justice is declining or neglecting to take a proper part in the exercise of his functions as a justice of the peace.
Textual Amendments
Thankyou for visiting my blog share this with your friends and family spread this all over social media I am not on social media.
The more that know about this the better!
I don't know why anyone would want to contact me but I have setup an E-mail account just for this blog.

lawfulrebellionuk@yahoo.com


I will be updating this blog when I get a chance to.

I also want to take this opportunity to thank all those who made the video's I have uploaded to this blog and that I have given links to you are all unsung heroes!






































































No comments:

Post a Comment