Perjury act 1911 Section 12 and section 7

12 Form of indictment.

(1)In an indictment—

(a)for making any false statement or false representation punishable under this Act; or

(b)for unlawfully, wilfully, falsely, fraudulently, deceitfully, maliciously, or corruptly taking, making, signing, or subscribing any oath, affirmation, solemn declaration, statutory declaration, affidavit, deposition, notice, certificate, or other writing,

it is sufficient to set forth the substance of the offence charged, and before which court or person (if any) the offence was committed without setting forth the proceedings or any part of the proceedings in the course of which the offence was committed, and without setting forth the authority of any court or person before whom the offence was committed.

(2)In an indictment for aiding, abetting, counselling, suborning, or procuring any other person to commit any offence herein-before in this section mentioned, or for conspiring with any other person, . . . F1, to commit any such offence, it is sufficient—

(a)where such offence has been committed, to allege that offence, and then to allege that the defendant procured the commission of that offence; and

(b)where such offence has not been committed, to set forth the substance of the offence charged against the defendant without setting forth any matter or thing which it is unnecessary to aver in the case of an indictment for a false statement or false representation punishable under this Act.

Textual Amendments

7 Aiders, abettors, suborners, &c.

(1)Every person who aids, abets, counsels, procures, or suborns another person to commit an offence against this Act shall be liable to be proceeded against, indicted, tried and punished as if he were a principal offender.

(2)Every person who incites . . . F1 another person to commit an offence against this Act shall be guilty of a misdemeanour, and, on conviction thereof on indictment, shall be liable to imprisonment, or to a fine, or to both such imprisonment and fine.

Magistrates' Courts Act 1980

You are here:

• UK Public General Acts
• 1980 c. 43
• PART IV
• Procuring attendance of witness
• Section 97

• Table of Contents
• Content
• More Resources

• Previous: Provision
• Next: Provision

• Plain View
• Print Options

What Version

• Latest available (Revised)
• Original (As enacted)

Opening OptionsExpand opening options

More ResourcesExpand PDF versions

Status:

This is the original version (as it was originally enacted).

97Summons to witness and warrant for his arrest

(1)Where a justice of the peace for any county, any London commission area or the City of London is satisfied that any person in England or Wales is likely to be able to give material evidence, or produce any document or thing likely to be material evidence, at an inquiry into an indictable offence by a magistrates' court for that county, that London commission area or the City (as the case may be) or at the summary trial of an information or hearing of a complaint by such a court and that that person will not voluntarily attend as a witness or will not voluntarily produce the document or thing, the justice shall issue a summons directed to that person requiring him to attend before the court at the time and place appointed in the summons to give evidence or to produce the document or thing.

(2)If a justice of the peace is satisfied by evidence on oath of the matters mentioned in subsection (1) above, and also that it is probable that a summons under that subsection would not procure the attendance of the person in question, the justice may instead of issuing a summons issue a warrant to arrest that person and bring him before such a court as aforesaid at a time and place specified in the warrant; but a warrant shall not be issued under this subsection where the attendance is required for the hearing of a complaint.

(3)On the failure of any person to attend before a magistrates* court in answer to a summons under this section, if—

(a)the court is satisfied by evidence on oath that he is likely to be able to give material evidence or produce any document or thing likely to be material evidence in the proceedings; and

(b)it is proved on oath, or in such other manner as may be prescribed, that he has been duly served with the summons, and that a reasonable sum has been paid or tendered to him for costs and expenses; and

(c)it appears to the court that there is no just excuse for the failure,

the court may issue a warrant to arrest him and bring him before the court at a time and place specified in the warrant

(4)If any person attending or brought before a magistrates* court refuses without just excuse to be sworn or give evidence, or to produce any document or thing, the court may commit him to custody until the expiration of such period not exceeding 7 days as may be specified in the warrant or until he sooner gives evidence or produces the document or thing.

Conclusion.

I have exposed the corrupt courts in this country. I have shared with you my story and have uploaded videos of our corrupt courts. You need to change your perspective about  our country. It's not a shining beacon of hope!
Most of the people who work in the courts are criminals. The courts are hired. All courts are commercial but they are supposed to be courts of common law of the land. The judges and magistrates are required to swear an oath to the crown which represents common law of the land.
Constables also swear an oath to the crown but they enforce acts and statutes.
If you are ever confronted by a constable for an act you should challenge them if they are on their oath and that's an oath to enforce common law of the land. You should search for constables oath under police reform act 2002.

83 Attestation of constables

For Schedule 4 to the 1996 Act there shall be substituted—

“SCHEDULE 4 Form of Declaration

’I....................of....................do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will, to the best of my skill and knowledge, discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.’”

So that's proof you don't need to follow acts the constables are only  bound by common law so you'll always need to challenge them on that.
I suggest you down load that video on youtube I told you about.

Strawman the true nature of the cage (official)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sArXw6ajNg&t=40s

Despite the above oath the stasi still break the law by enforcing an act. first video challenging the stasi to be on their oath but they are only interested in acts which are not on their oath.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j54j2XiQM9g part 2 the stasi go against their oath break a window cause offence against property assault offence against people treason going against their oath. so they break the law to enforce an act. "nice"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjP7qLs5Bjc they are criminals in uniform!!!

The only way I know how to download from youtube with viddly download viddly to your taskbar. type the video into youtube strawman the true nature of the cage (official)
left click on the URL bar at the top of your screen when it highlights blue right click on copy on your taskbar click on v or hidden icons and download video mp4.
You all should do what I have done I have registered my birth certificate with the common law court to confirm I am a living man. Not a legal fiction person (birth certificate).
Acts and statutes are only given the force of law by the consent of the governed.
So you always have the right not to consent.
Council tax is the local government finance act 1992. So if you do not consent to pay your council tax as it is an act the council will issue you with a summons to court.
I have uploaded the magistrate courts act1980: summons to court and warrant for arrest and it does not say the council can summons you to court so they have committed perjury I have uploaded section 12 of the perjury act when I went to court I asked the court if they  support the fake summons they did so they have committed section 7 of the perjury act and contempt of court. as these people like their acts and statutes I use the acts and statutes against them. I contacted Robert Buckland QC MP Who is the Lord Chancellor who's  job it is to remove any lay justice. He has not so he's a criminal.

11Resignation and removal of lay justices

(1)A lay justice may resign his office at any time.

(2)The Lord Chancellor may [F1, with the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice,] remove a lay justice from his office by an instrument on behalf and in the name of Her Majesty—

(a)on the ground of incapacity or misbehaviour,

(b)on the ground of a persistent failure to meet such standards of competence as are prescribed by a direction given by the Lord Chancellor [F2with the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice] , or

(c)if he is satisfied that the lay justice is declining or neglecting to take a proper part in the exercise of his functions as a justice of the peace.

Textual Amendments

Thankyou for visiting my blog share this with your friends and family spread this all over social media I am not on social media.
The more that know about this the better!
I don't know why anyone would want to contact me but I have setup an E-mail account just for this blog.

lawfulrebellionuk@yahoo.com

I will be updating this blog when I get a chance to.

I also want to take this opportunity to thank all those who made the video's I have uploaded to this blog and that I have given links to you are all unsung heroes!