Saturday, 15 May 2021

Lincolnshire Police Have Been Referred To The Professional Standards Department And The IOPC

If You are looking for helpful video's part 2 go to the January 2020 archive.

If any of you can't get on this blog on laptop or pc you need to use the long line address bar at the top of your screen and type in.

https://kangaroocourtuk.blogspot.com  


Here's the police confirming they are under investigation. Please note when you report the police for breaking the law they will say you made a complaint they twist everything you say!

LincsPSDComplaints 

  • 5/17/2021 at 10:24 AM

Dear Mr (Redacted)

 

We are writing to acknowledge your complaint and confirm it has been received within the Professional Standards Department.

 

We are sorry to hear that you are dissatisfied with the actions of Lincolnshire Police.

 

We have read your email below and identified two complaints that we will forward on for assessment by the Appropriate Authority within this department.

 

  1. Former CC Bill Skelly failed to respond to emails and take appropriate action against Tracey Parker and the Magistrates Court.
  2. Officers failed to take appropriate action against offenders on 12/05/21.

And Here again is hidden camera footage I uploaded to helpful video's part 2 Filmed at Plymouth Magistrates Court. It's only on for just over a minute it's not the best quality footage and you might want to pump up the volume.




Lousy Lincolnshire branch of the Stasi have been referred to the professional standards department and now the IOPC.

Apparently the IOPC is the independent office for police conduct. I'll believe it when I see it.

Lousy Lincolnshire Stasi have been referred to the professional standards department and IOPC as they have been aiding and abetting the crimes I have been informing them of since last year. Since last year we have had a change of chief constables and yet the crimes they commit stay the same.

Last Wednesday (12th may) I was arrested outside The Kangaroo Court High Street Lincoln on suspicion of causing criminal damage.

Despite the fact I was assaulted and robbed by 1 of the security at the kangaroo court and 3 others held me in false imprisonment I was the only one arrested so PC'S Beavis and Butthead are aiding and abetting their crimes and committed treason.

After spending 8 hours in a police cell the investigating constable PC 333 Stinky Stevens gave me a 15 minute interview to ask me about 3 photo's. It took her 8 hours to decide to interview me after spending 8 hours looking at 3 photo's. I told Stinky Stevens I did not even brake anything. 333 Stinky Stevens Defined Criminal Damage as deliberately causing reckless criminal damage. What sort of definition is that?

Despite the fact Stinky Stevens don't seem to know what criminal damage actually is she charged me with criminal damage. I asked her why the 4 security that committed offences against me were not arrested she replied I'm not dealing with that I'm dealing with this even though it's all part of the same thing. So PC Stevens has joined her colleagues in committing crimes. She has committed aiding and abetting, Treason as she has not fulfilled her role according to the oath she took as constable I will prevent all offences against people and not some offences against some people and she has also committed misconduct in public office. I have written to the dopey git telling her I am investigating her and if she don't attend a recorded interview with me during the week commencing 17th may 2021 then she is perverting the course of justice.

During an interview with PC 333 Stevens after she ended the skype call with the duty solicitor I asked

PC 333 Stevens why she didn't arrest the security and the Magistrates she responded by pointing at the recording machine and said SHUSH! I think it's still recording.

Has PC Stevens been arrested for her crimes? Nope Lincolnshire Stasi cover up her crimes Covering up the crimes of the Police by The so called Professional standards department is that routine it seems to be standard procedure up and down the country.


It is no wonder I say the Stasi are criminals in uniform and they have been referred to the professional standards department and the IOPC.

PC 333 Stevens is the sort of person who thinks PC World is a planet.

With all the crimes that have been committed by Lincolnshire Stasi, Now would be the perfect time for them to change their motto.



I have contacted Marc Jones the Lincolnshire police and crime commissioner about this he does what he usually does he hits the delete button so he can earn an easy paycheque. It is the job of the crime commissioner to investigate the police and you know that's not true when his office is at Lincolnshire Police Headquarters.

For the benefit of those who can't be bothered to go back to the beginning of my blog to see what I'm on about.

The city of Lincoln council issued me with a fake court summons over council tax dispute.                     according to the magistrates courts act only a magistrate or clerk to a magistrate can issue a court summons. So that is fraud and perjury.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/1-2/6/section/12 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/43/section/1 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/43/section/97 

The Fake magistrates said they supported the fake summons so they committed Treason, Fraud, Contempt of Court, Aiding Abetting and Suborning, Misconduct in Public Office.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/1-2/6/section/7

Both former and current chief constables also are aiding abetting this as I e-mailed them and did nothing about it. A few more constables I told about it also aid and abet this as I also told them and they did nothing. Not the Police service I was hoping for.







Since last year I have been Trying To contact Karl McCartney MP He has not got back so he too is Aiding and Abetting.

I have contacted Police and Crime Commissioner Marc Jones about this He too has done nothing So He also is Aiding and Abetting.

The Police recently referred themselves to their own Professional Standards Department. The Police are investigating themselves just like they did just after the Sarah Everard Vigil and they more or less said We investigated ourselves and we found we did nothing wrong.

I referred Lincolnshire Police to the IOPC whether they do something or not I don't Know.

The IOPC investigate some Police but I have also heard criticisms about the IOPC. 

Here's a Rogues Gallery of A Few Wanted Faces.


Former Criminal Chief Constable Now Fugitive Bill Skelly.



Current Criminal Chief Constable Chris Haward.

STAR CHAMBER Criminal Karl McCartney MP.

Role of a Police and Crime Commissioner


Criminal Crime Commissioner Marc Jones Who's Job it is to hold Lincolnshire Police and the Chief Constable account but not when you E-mail Marc Jones About Lincolnshire Police and The Chief Constable all of a sudden he can't be bothered to do his job as he should. He'll read your e-mail think to himself  I can't be bothered with that hit the delete button so he can earn an easy paycheque!!! £66,000

The Chief Constable is not exactly earning his £161,000.

Criminal Karl McCartney is not exactly earning his £81,000 Paycheque.

I have put in a Subject Access request with the police in regards to body cam footage when they arrested me for criminal damage What I think will happen is they will say the person who is dealing with data was off ill or on annual leave or what ever story they will come up with and say this has gone past the time limit we can hold data so we had to delete the video.

So it can't be used against them.

I have sent this Email to the police in Regards to the cover up of  their investigation for corruption.

LincsPSD@lincs.pnn.police.uk 

  • 6/2/2021 at 9:31 AM

Can I get an update on the cover up (Investigation) inregards to an E-mail mail I sent to Criminal Chief Constable Chris Haward in regards to the crimes of Former Criminal Chief Constable Bill Skelly and Tracey Parker From the City of Lincoln Council and the corrupt Magistrates.
Tracey Parker sent out fake summons to appear at the magistrates That's Perjury and fraud and she bribes the corrupt Magistrates for a liability order.
The Corrupt magistrates support the fake summons thus aiding abetting and suborning Tracey Parkers offences also the Corrupt magistrates committed Treason Fraud Contempt of Court Misconduct in Public office.
Why has Tracey Parker, The Magistrates, The Clerk to the Magistrates Micheal Seath and Bill Skelly Not been arrested?
If you can give me an update on your Arse Covering Exercise That'll Be Great.
 
 
 
 
bill.skelly@lincs.pnn.police.uk
 9/1/20
 
I have sent this email in regards to a Kangaroo Court I Attended 7,1,20.
I am sure you are not interested about this or make any arrests as you are a senior constable in the same corrupt judiciary and if you fail to make any arrests you will also be committing an offence.
 
I got an illegal summons to the "magistrates court" from "The City of Lincoln Council".
So in the kangaroo court I asked Tracey Parker from the council The 2 FAKE magistrates and the so called legal advisor if they support the fake summons and they all did so I tried to show but they was not interested so I read the Courts Act 2003
43 Summons or Warrant for suspected Offender
(1) on an information being laid before a justice of the peace that a person has, or is suspected of having, committed an offence, the justice may issue- 
(a) a summons directed to that person requiring him to appear before a magistrates court to answer the information or
(b) a warrant to arrest that person and bring him before a magistrates court.
Magistrates Courts Act 1980
97 Summons to witness and warrant for his arrest.
(1) where a justice of the peace is satisfied that 
(a) any person in england or wales is likely to be able to give material evidence or produce any document or thing likely to be material evidence at the summary trial of an information or hearing of a complaint f2 by a magistrates court.
 
Please note that it does not say the council can issue a summons and a justice of the peace should always be on their oath when in court.
more offences.
 
as they still support the Fake summons the court and tracey parker are guilty of.
Purjury Act 1911
 
12 Form of Indictment.(1) in an indictment
(a) for making any false statement or false representation punishable under this act or
(b) for unlawfully,wilfully,falsely,fraudulently,miliciously,or corruptly,making,signing,or subscribing any oath affirmation solem declaration statutory declaration affidavit,notice,certificate or other writing,
it issufficient to set forth the substance of the offence charged and before which court or person if any the offence was committed without setting forth the proceedings or any part of the proceedings in the course in which the offence was committed and without setting forth the authority or any court or person before whom the offence was committed.
(2) in an indictment for aiding and abbetting,counselling,suborning,or procuring any other person to commit any offence herein-before in this section mentioned or for conspiring with any other person F1 to commit any such offence it is suffcient-
(a) Where such offence has been committed to allege that offence and then to allege that the defendant procured the commission of that offence and
(b) Where such offence has not been committed to set forth the substance of the offence charged against the defendant without setting forth any matter or thing which it is unnecessary to aver in the case of an indictment for a false statement or false representation punishable under this act.
Section 5 of the purjury act is similar.so if you do not act against the above offences you are guilty of.
Purjury Act 1911
7 Aiders,Abettors,suborners
(1) Every person who aiders,abets,counsels,procures or suborns another person to commit an offence against this act shall be liable to be proceeded against indicted, tried and punished as if he were a principal offender.
(2) Every person who incites F1 another person to commit an offence against this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanour and on conviction thereof on indictment shall be liable to imprisonment or to a fine or to both such imprisonment and fine.
 
Also when I was in this kangaroo court tracey parker said she  charged me £22 for a liability order that she applied for the court for so when the 2 FAKE  magistrates retired I said you'll get the liability order as you payed the court for it when the 2 FAKE magistrates returned to the court I failed to rise for then thus not giving them jurisdiction over me but still they awarded her the liability order.(who would of seen that coming?)
I then asked the 2 FAKE  magistrates if they were on their oath the legal advisor said they were so I asked them to prove it and they failed to do so.
so there are plenty of offences I have listed that you will not make any arrests over.
 

Here's the response from the corrupt police. I asked them about what happened last year January 2020 and they responded about what happened 12th may 2021. They don't want to talk about what happened with Tracey Parker From the City of Lincoln Council, The Corrupt Magistrates and The Then Chief Constable Bill Skelly. Do I need anymore Evidence of their Corruption? 

Just to let you all know 12th may 2021 I did go to the kangaroo court high street Lincoln and start spray painting and I only got as far as spraying KANGAR before I was assaulted by G4S Security.

I was spray painting as it is a kangaroo court it's not a real court it is a registered business and the so-called magistrates are just fraudsters with no jurisdiction whatsoever and yet on a daily basis they fine people give them community service and send people to prison. sending people to prison without jurisdiction to do so is kidnapping and false imprisonment and they take back handers from Tracey Parker of the city of Lincoln council in return for liability orders. So the emails below the police responded to the events on 12th may even though I asked them in regards to the crimes committed January 2020 and I put at the top of this page when the Police are involved in crimes they just twist everything you say.

Update!!

Wednesday 16 June 2021 I had a zoom call with a solicitor in regards to what happened on 12th may and she read to me a police statement from a G4S security who assaulted and robbed me and I said to her wait a minute the police said to me in an email ( see below ) That they don't know what I'm talking about there is no evidence of the allegations I made against G4S security even though there's a camera on the high street outside the court and CCTV on a takeaway next to the kangaroo court and the CCTV is pointing at the court then the solicitor started smiling as she knows about the CCTV and you just read to me a police statement that the G4S security made and yet the police claim there's no evidence.

Good morning Mr 

 

We responded to you by email on 21/05/2021 to advise you that no action was to be taken regarding your complaint.

 

The letter attached to that email detailed your right to request a review of this decision by the Police and Crime Commissioner, and provided contact details should you wish to apply for a review.

 

I have attached a copy of this letter for your information, which stipulates that any review request must be received by 22/06/2021.

 

Regards


Mr Lambert

Via email



21 May 2021                                                            



Dear Mr Lambert


Complaint Against Police - Our ref: CO/00422/21


I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence received in this department on 17/05/2021. I regret that you have had to notify us of your dissatisfaction in this matter.


Your complaint has been formally recorded under Schedule 3 of the Police Reform Act 2002.

However, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) statutory guidance (paragraph 12.10) states that in some circumstances it may not be reasonable and proportionate to take further action with a complaint after recording it.


One of these circumstances is where:


The complaint contains too little information to be able to progress any enquiries, and our attempts to clarify it with you have been unsuccessful.


It is unclear exactly what the complainant is complaining about as he was arrested for causing criminal damage to the magistrate’s court by spray painting it. There is nothing to indicate a robbery and he refuses to engage to clarify what the circumstances of his complaint are. The other matters in his correspondence relate to the judicial system and City of Lincoln council and are not matters for the police complaints system.


For this reason, although your complaint has been recorded, no further action will be taken on this occasion.



Your right of review


You have the right to apply for a review of the outcome of the complaint. Your review will be considered by the Police and Crime Commissioner for Lincolnshire.


Information about how to apply for a review can be found on the Lincolnshire Police and Crime Commissioner’s website: www.lincolnshire-pcc.gov.uk. The website contains a form that you can download and print off, or you can contact the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner (OPCC) in the following ways:

Email: complaints-pcc@lincs.pnn.police.uk

Write to: The Police and Crime Commissioner, Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner, Deepdale Lane, Nettleham, Lincoln, LN2 2LT


If you need help with your application, please contact the Police and Crime Commissioners Office on telephone: 01522 947192. I draw your attention to the fact that the OPCC must receive any appeal within 29 days of the date of this letter, that being 22/06/2021.


Please note that by submitting a request for a review, any information generated and reviewed as part of your complaint will then be shared with the OPCC and their third party provider (Sancus Solutions Ltd), to enable them to investigate and review your case appropriately. 1 More information about complaint reviews can be found on the IOPC website: www.policeconduct.gov.uk.



Yours sincerely




Chief Inspector Outen

Deputy Head of Professional Standards




1 The legal basis for this information sharing is under Articles 6(1)(c) & (e) and Articles 9(2)(g) & Sch1 Part 2(8) and Sch1, Part 3(36) of the Data Protection Act 2018 and also under the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011. For further information on our legal basis for sharing information, please see Lincolnshire Police’s Privacy Notice available via the below link:

https://www.lincs.police.uk/resource-library/data-protection/privacy-notice/ 


The IOPC who seem to be the corrupt police protection service and is covering up the crimes of  Lincolnshire branch of the Stasi who are criminals in uniform have very bad ratings on the link below.

https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.policeconduct.gov.uk 


Friday 18th June 2021 I was in the Kangaroo court 358 high street Lincoln.

I asked the guy on the bench if he was on his judicial oath he said he was I asked to see it and after a bit of thinking he said no because it is hanging in my office. So that means he's not on his oath I asked for his name I couldn't understand him as he was behind a big screen like you have at the post office Peter Veits he said I'm a District Judge. But as he's not on his oath He's a fake District Judge!!!

The fake District Judge Peter Veits Threatened to send me to the cells if I didn't do what he said. Forcing me to and holding me in the cells when he has no Jurisdiction over me to do so Is conspiracy to Kidnap and false imprisonment.

Below under quotation I copied a definition of Kidnapping and false imprisonment.

Report the crimes of the fake Magistrates and fake district judges to the police and they will ignore you thus aiding and abetting others committing crimes as usual!!!

"THE LAW COMMISSION SIMPLIFICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW: KIDNAPPING AND RELATED OFFENCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – KIDNAPPING AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT

CLARIFICATION OF KIDNAPPING AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT 1.5 Kidnapping and false imprisonment are both common law offences. They are defined in case law, and not in legislation.

2.1 In the case of D1 Lord Brandon defined kidnapping as follows: First, the nature of the offence is an attack on and infringement of the personal liberty of an individual. Secondly, the offence contains four ingredients as follows: (1) the taking or carrying away of one person by another; (2) by force or fraud; (3) without the consent of the person so taken and carried away; and (4) without lawful excuse. 

PART 3 FALSE IMPRISONMENT 3.1 False imprisonment is defined as “the unlawful and intentional or reckless restraint of V’s freedom of movement from a particular place”.1 This definition has been quoted without dispute in many cases.2 "

I got unconditional Bail until August.

I don't know how I got bail as I was not onboard a ship.





. :
.