If You Can't Access This Site On Another Search Engine Change www. For Https://kangaroocourtuk.blogspot.com
If This is the first post you have read you might want to work your way back to get the gist of things.
Hello You Corrupt Piece Of Shit.
You Obviously Did Not Take Any Notice of the first letter I sent you so here it is again you dumb corrupt piece of shit!!!!!
I again have sent you, you corrupt piece of shit withdrawal of implied rights of access and castle law.
If You think you can pass judgement against a legal fiction for financial gain not only are you committing several counts of fraud but you need to undergo psychiatric evaluation as you are not the full ticket.
I will be contacting the common law court you will be indicted for trial in your presence or in your absence and you will be tried by a jury of your peers and the evidence against you is is not looking good for you is it you corrupt piece of shit?
To The Corrupt Manager Of The Corrupt Court.
Ref: H00LN602
Please Note The Legal Fiction Will Not Appear In Or Telephone The Corrupt Court 27 October 2021 At 10:15.
I Have Registered My Birth Certificate With The Common Law Court And Thus I Have Taken Ownership Of The Legal Fiction.
The Criminal State And The Fake District Judge Who Is Not On Their Judicial Oath Has No Jurisdiction Over The Legal Fiction!!!
So If The Fake District Judge Who Is Not Their Judicial Oath Want To Find A Common Law Offence As The ( REDACTED ) Act Is An Act Of Parliament And Not Common Law.
Let The Fake District Judge Know He Needs To Send Me His Judicial Oath For Inspection.
If The Fake District Judge Fails To Prove Jurisdiction Then The Fake District Judge Will Be Committing The Offence Of Conspiracy To Commit Fraud By False Representation Contrary To Section 2 Of The Fraud Act 2006 And I will Contact Chief Criminal Constable Chris Haward To Arrest The Fake District Judge. I’m Sure The Stasi Will Want To Arrest The Fake District Judge As I Have Issued Chief Criminal Constable Chris Haward With A Criminal Indictment And I Have Issued TRACEY PARKER With A Criminal Indictment For Fraud And Perjury.
I’m Sure The Fake District Judge Will Award The City Of Lincoln Council That Is A Registered Business I Found On Dun And Bradstreet And I Found Lincoln Magistrates Court On Dun And Bradstreet So I Will Take The Fake District Judge To The Common Law Court And Simultaneously To Crown Court. Like I Said I Have Issued Criminal Indictments Against Chief Criminal CHRIS HAWARD, TRACEY PARKER And Fake District Judge PETER VEITS.
So Good Luck Doing Your Dodgy Deals Behind Closed Doors Because I Am Coming After You-You Corrupt Pieces Of Shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yours Faithfully.
No Contract!
To all that it concerns
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL AND NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT APPLIES
Notice of Removal of Implied Right of Access
You are advised to read the following notice thoroughly and carefully. It is a lawful notice. It informs you. It means what it says. I hereby give notice that the implied right of access to the property known as ( REDACTED ) and surrounding areas, has been removed, along with all associated property including, but not limited to, any private conveyance in respect of the following:
1) ANY employee, principal, agent, third party or representative or any other person acting on behalf of or under the instruction of HER MAJESTY’S COURT SERVICE, or any other CORPORATE BODY (i.e. Company) whosoever named and,
2) ANY POLICE OFFICER who is acting for the CORPORATE POLICE and NOT acting as a Constable for and on behalf of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and her people as expressed in the Oath of Office of all POLICE men and women, that is as Public Servants, upon your Oath of Office to serve "with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property"
COMMON LAW JURISDICTION APPLIES EXCLUSIVELY
Please also take notice that the land known as England is a Common Law jurisdiction and any transgression of this notice will be dealt with Private Prosecutions according to, and under, the Common Law.
Any and all access to the above-mentioned properties shall be by strict invitation only and shall be subject to terms and conditions, available by written request.
We do not have, and have never had, a contract. And any permission that you believe you may have from me is hereby withdrawn. If you believe that you have power of attorney to act on my behalf you are hereby fired, and any consent that you believe you may have, tacit or otherwise, is hereby withdrawn. If you feel so inclined as to enforce statutes as a consequence of this matter I will report your conduct to ALL relevant bodies and will pursue Proof of Claim in affidavit form, under your full commercial liability and under the penalty of perjury.
You are deemed to have been served this notice with immediate effect.
In sincerity and honour, without ill-will, frivolity, or vexation,
Lawful and Peaceful Inhabitant of this Dwelling, English Sovereign.
Without any admission of any liability whosoever, and with all Indefeasible Rights reserved.
Castle Law/Castle Doctrine
England and Wales
In English common law a defendant may seek to avoid criminal or civil liability by claiming that he acted in self-defence.[56] This requires the jury to determine whether the defendant believed that force was necessary to defend him or herself, their property, or to prevent a crime, and that the force used was reasonable.[57] While there is no duty to retreat from an attacker and failure to do so is not conclusive evidence that a person did not act in self-defence, it may still be considered by the jury as a relevant factor when assessing the merits of a self-defence claim.[56] The common law duty to retreat was repealed by the Criminal Law Act 1967. This duty never existed when a person is somewhere he has a lawful right to be, but due to the repeal, now extends to public places, etc.
v
Commentaries on the Laws of England,[11] proclaims that the laws "leave him (the inhabitant) the natural right of killing the aggressor
And the law of England has so particular and tender a regard to the immunity of a man's house, that it stiles it his castle, and will never suffer it to be violated with immunity: agreeing herein with the sentiments of ancient Rome, as expressed in the works of Tully;[12] quid enim sanctius, quid omni religione munitius, quam domus uniusquisque civium?[13] For this reason no doors can in general be broken open to execute any civil process; though, in criminal causes, the public safety supersedes the private. Hence also in part arises the animadversion of the law upon eaves-droppers, nuisancers, and incendiaries: and to this principle it must be assigned, that a man may assemble people together lawfully without danger of raising a riot, rout, or unlawful assembly, in order to protect and defend his house; which he is not permitted to do in any other case.
— William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England
Not only was the doctrine considered to justify defence against neighbours and criminals, but any of the Crown's agents who attempted to enter without a proper warrant as well.
SECOND LETTER.
Hearing Number (claim number) H00LN602
Hello You Corrupt Piece of Shit!!!
I wrote to the kangaroo court and I said the judge needs to send me a copy of their judicial oath and you failed to do so, so you are committing at least 3 counts of fraud you corrupt piece of shit.
I know you have to be on your oath and you are not on your oath are you, you corrupt piece of shit!!!
Oaths | Courts and Tribunals Judiciary from www.judiciary.uk
Oaths
When judges are sworn in they take two oaths/affirmations. The first is the oath of allegiance and the second the judicial oath; these are collectively referred to as the judicial oath.
Oath of allegiance
“I, _________ , do swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs and successors, according to law.”
Judicial oath
“I, _________ , do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of ________ , and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will.”
Affirmation – Allegiance
“I, ____________ , do solemnly sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second Her Heirs and Successors according to Law.”
Affirmation – Judicial
“I, ____________ , do solemnly sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of ____________ , and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this Realm without fear or favour, affection or ill will.”
Promissory Oaths Act 1868
Form of judicial oath.
The oath in this Act referred to as the judicial oath shall be in the form following; that is to say,
“I, , do swear that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Victoria in the office of , and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or illwill. So help me God.”]
So In the judicial oath you are not on it says I will serve without ill will or favour but you do the opposite as you are a fraudster and a corrupt piece of shit. And you can add treason to the offences that you have committed.
I am still waiting for a copy of your oath from before the date of the hearing 27,10,21 by the looks of things I will be waiting for the rest of my life isn’t that right you corrupt piece of shit.
